Briefly: If I had to name the one word, that is most often used to
label something as what it is not, my vote would go to "healthy". Whether it's the issue of sugar vs. honey, of butter vs. oil or of calories vs. nutrients, science and evidence are clearly not playing the lead role in the culinary theater of the world wide web. Judging by its popularity, that's a missed opportunity.
PrintPDF
Our best bet for healthy aging is to escape the flawed health care system. It makes disease treatment more profitable than prevention. It neglects aging as a treatable cause of diseases. And it denies access to personalized lifestyle medicine. This blog is about how you can overcome these limitations. It is about challenging half-truths and outdated ideas. It is focused on evidence-based, personalized lifestyle medicine for lifelong health. Delivered by a feisty public health scientist.
Monday, May 28, 2012
Thursday, May 24, 2012
The Death Of Good Cholesterol
Briefly
There were always two types of cholesterol, the good and the
bad. Until now. A large new study tells us that good cholesterol might have
been an impostor. That's food for the media types. For those who think before
they type, the real news is that we are finally getting closer to uncovering
the impostors. Thanks to the genetics revolution which seems to be paying off
in an unexpected area.
PrintPDF
Monday, May 21, 2012
Individualized Medicine, Ignorant Medics And An Invitation To Lose Weight.
In my previous post I promised to talk about your
individualized way to achieving optimal health. If that made you think
about personalized medicine, you were right. Almost. Because personalized
medicine is still light-years away from us. That's the bad news. The good news,
personalized prevention is an emerging reality. At least in my lab. Which is
why I would like to invite you to become a part of it. No strings attached. But
before we get to this let's first get on the same page about the
personalization of medicine.
Two questions we need to ask ourselves: What is personalized
medicine and why would we want it?
Professor Jeremy K Nicholson of the Imperial College,
London, defined personalized medicine as "effective therapies that are
tailored to the exact biology or biological state of an individual" [1]. Such tailoring of a
treatment, say for your high blood pressure, would require your doctor to evaluate
your biochemical and metabolic profile in order to prescribe you the most
effective drug or treatment at the most effective dose, with the least possibility
of side effects.
Now, why would we want this?
PrintPDF
Friday, May 18, 2012
How to survive the health care system.
Labels:
bextra,
big pharma,
hdl levels,
health,
heart disease,
increase hdl,
life,
Merck,
oseltamivir,
Pfizer,
pharmaceutical,
risk score,
Roche,
tamiflu,
torcetrapib,
what ldl cholesterol
Location:
Baden-Baden, Deutschland
Monday, May 14, 2012
Why your heart attack may just be collateral damage in big pharma's turf wars.
When a pharmaceutical company tells you that its drug is
safer than it really is, it probably plays with your health. And possibly with
your life. That's not a very nice thing to do. But it's also very profitable. Which
is why it happens more often that you care to know.
Labels:
Actos,
Avandia,
Cleveland clinics,
diabetes,
Finance,
GlaxoSmithKline,
health,
heart attack,
life,
Nissen,
Pioglitazone,
Rosiglitazone,
Senate Committee,
Takeda
Location:
Baden-Baden, Deutschland
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)